Wednesday, 24 February 2010
Monday, 21 September 2009
死海文卷
英文是 Dead Sea Scrolls。
在星加坡早一陣子有一個〔死海文卷〕的展覽,而星加坡是亞洲第一個國家有這一個〔死海文卷〕展覽,會有部份〔死海文卷〕既展出。個人覺得理由好簡單,同在星加坡上影荷李活電影比較快一樣,可以省除了翻譯,可以快好多。
未去呢個展之前,我對〔死海文卷〕的認識都仲是停留在 《新世紀福音戰士》(1995)(日語:新世紀エヴァンゲリオン;英文:Neon Genesis Evangelion)的年代。即係當時〔死海文卷〕還是神秘,未明所以,未翻譯好的部依然多,大家對〔死海文卷〕的內容還是高度猜測的年代,有人估計內容是關於世界末日, 也有好多人因為類似原因攻擊聖經的真確性。
去展覽前參巧〔死海文卷〕最新的資料,發覺已經面目全非,十年人事幾翻新。於翻譯了既絕大部份的文卷內,都係現有聖經的內容。而大部份內容都是沒大兩樣,什至有一篇/書的內容完全一樣。
因此, 〔死海文卷〕失去了神秘性,大家(可能只是我)又少了一個可能會世界末日的諗法,想借此卷攻擊聖經的人又啞聲,同時我都對零波麗都失去了興趣...
但是,有機會參觀,按道理都不容錯過,看一看這一部大約有二千年歷史的古卷什麼來頭。
展覽一開始先會播放一段關於〔死海文卷〕紀錄片,接著上樓上展覽廳有一些歷代不同大少不同制做做方法的聖經的展覽。走了大約兩個廳,都是如此,都看不著 〔死海文卷〕。
結果到時後,找到了:
就是這一片很小的一塊。
當然只是其中的一小小小小小小小塊,在這一個展覽會,總共有四塊,上圖的一塊好像是最大塊。
可能本人對文卷這一字有所吾解。
又可能個個展覽會個 Video 頗精采(對一個展覽而言),再加上 Web Site 內真是有一卷東西...
無論如何,都是一個有趣的一晚。
在星加坡早一陣子有一個〔死海文卷〕的展覽,而星加坡是亞洲第一個國家有這一個〔死海文卷〕展覽,會有部份〔死海文卷〕既展出。個人覺得理由好簡單,同在星加坡上影荷李活電影比較快一樣,可以省除了翻譯,可以快好多。
未去呢個展之前,我對〔死海文卷〕的認識都仲是停留在 《新世紀福音戰士》(1995)(日語:新世紀エヴァンゲリオン;英文:Neon Genesis Evangelion)的年代。即係當時〔死海文卷〕還是神秘,未明所以,未翻譯好的部依然多,大家對〔死海文卷〕的內容還是高度猜測的年代,有人估計內容是關於世界末日, 也有好多人因為類似原因攻擊聖經的真確性。
去展覽前參巧〔死海文卷〕最新的資料,發覺已經面目全非,十年人事幾翻新。於翻譯了既絕大部份的文卷內,都係現有聖經的內容。而大部份內容都是沒大兩樣,什至有一篇/書的內容完全一樣。
因此, 〔死海文卷〕失去了神秘性,大家(可能只是我)又少了一個可能會世界末日的諗法,想借此卷攻擊聖經的人又啞聲,同時我都對零波麗都失去了興趣...
但是,有機會參觀,按道理都不容錯過,看一看這一部大約有二千年歷史的古卷什麼來頭。
展覽一開始先會播放一段關於〔死海文卷〕紀錄片,接著上樓上展覽廳有一些歷代不同大少不同制做做方法的聖經的展覽。走了大約兩個廳,都是如此,都看不著 〔死海文卷〕。
結果到時後,找到了:
就是這一片很小的一塊。
當然只是其中的一小小小小小小小塊,在這一個展覽會,總共有四塊,上圖的一塊好像是最大塊。
可能本人對文卷這一字有所吾解。
又可能個個展覽會個 Video 頗精采(對一個展覽而言),再加上 Web Site 內真是有一卷東西...
無論如何,都是一個有趣的一晚。
八十歲後
唔識我,十個有六個都以為我廿五歲。
上網時,做心理測驗十居其九都係話我似五十歲。
腳底按摩師父就話我似八十歲,禁邊到痛邊到。
早一陣,新聞話香港人平均年健齡七十九歲。
即係我已經 Above Mean,我加下每一日都仲係到既話已經賺左?
Haha....
上網時,做心理測驗十居其九都係話我似五十歲。
腳底按摩師父就話我似八十歲,禁邊到痛邊到。
早一陣,新聞話香港人平均年健齡七十九歲。
即係我已經 Above Mean,我加下每一日都仲係到既話已經賺左?
Haha....
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
漫畫啤酒入門
夏天,當然要喝啤酒!金黃剔透的液體,表層堆滿雪白細緻的泡沫,“咕嘟”一聲大口喝盡、暑氣全消,令人不禁讚嘆:啊!這才是、這才是成人專屬的滋味!但 是,你真的“認識”過啤酒嗎?你知道全世界的啤酒種類,依照發酵方法、口感風味、顏色、啤酒花的烹煮方式、水的硬度以及酵母的選擇不同而分類,竟有近百種 之多!而我們常喝的那幾個廠牌,只不過是其中的一種!藏在啤酒中的學問多而且廣,更有上千年的智慧和創意──原來,我們都太小看啤酒啦!本書是為遍及各年 齡層、每一位熱愛啤酒的“粉絲”們,量身企劃的入門書。輕鬆生動的漫畫,配上深入淺出的文字,從各種發酵技法開始,到各國啤酒風味的解析、下酒菜DIY食 譜,甚至用啤酒還能做出意想不到的超美味甜點!好玩又具知識性的題目,妙趣橫生的文筆,讀完本書就像痛飲一杯冰啤酒的感覺,消暑、解渴又清涼!
一本日本書,睇左大半,有趣既地方係會叫大家做一個品酒日記。
而的確係有可能會提昇對啤酒既了解。
跟住仲有取得 Beer Judge...
真係值得欣賞既係日本人可以從好小既事都可以將做出一個大家容易跟隨又有系統既方法。
跟住又諗下,佢地連打牌都可以拿 Certificate... 即係有一個方法,由理論到實戰去確認一個人既打牌能力...
一本日本書,睇左大半,有趣既地方係會叫大家做一個品酒日記。
而的確係有可能會提昇對啤酒既了解。
跟住仲有取得 Beer Judge...
真係值得欣賞既係日本人可以從好小既事都可以將做出一個大家容易跟隨又有系統既方法。
跟住又諗下,佢地連打牌都可以拿 Certificate... 即係有一個方法,由理論到實戰去確認一個人既打牌能力...
Monday, 24 August 2009
iPhone vs HTC Touch
I am not a fan of iPhone because I think the features provided by iPhone do not fit my daily need.
And I actually think that it is quite bad if you consider iPhone is a SmartPhone.
I got this picture few days earlier from a friend, which is quite funny, and it is actually right.
And I actually think that it is quite bad if you consider iPhone is a SmartPhone.
I got this picture few days earlier from a friend, which is quite funny, and it is actually right.
So an iPhone is just an inch better than a stone.
Haha....
Monday, 27 July 2009
Saturday, 18 July 2009
Garuda Indonesia II (Featuring CX / SQ)
After checking the safety record of Garuda Indonesia, then, out of curiosity, I checked the safety record of Cathay Pacific. I have been their Gold member for quite a while. There was a time I took their flight every week.
The last major accident was 15-Jun-1972. I was not on this earth yet. That accident killed 81 people. It was caused by a exploded bomb under a seat when flying.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific#Incidents_and_accidents
In wiki, it also indiciated other incidents dated from1948-1972.
Nothing really interesting, but CX awarded "This was the first hijacking of a commercial liner in the world...."...,
When I was about to sleep, "What about SQ?" popped up in my head. With all these some kind additional and duplicated, security and safety checking and even the crews claimed all these just because of our safety....
The list in aiddiaster.com was actually much shorter... only 1 major accident.
However, it was on 31-Oct-2000, it seemed to me very close... and I could probably trace what I was doing that day....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_airline#Incidents_and_accidents
31 October 2000 – Singapore Airlines Flight 006 operated by a Boeing 747-400, crashed at Chiang Kai-shek International Airport (now Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport) in Taiwan killing 83 people aboard and injuring 71 people during heavy rain caused by Typhoon Xangsane. SQ006 was the first fatal crash of a Singapore Airlines aircraft and the first fatal crash of the Boeing 747-400.
The scary part was, this incident was nothing to with multiple baggage scanning (before immigration, before boarding) and duplicated document check. (counter, before boarding, boarding).
In wiki, it also contained a link to SilkAir, which is an airline based in Singapore. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore Airlines Airline... I think this is a budget version of SQ.
I clicked the link about incidents again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir#Incidents_and_accidents
On December 19, 1997, SilkAir Flight 185, operated by a Boeing 737-300 and piloted by Captain Tsu Way Ming, plunged into the Musi River in Sumatra during a routine flight from Jakarta to Singapore, killing all 104 people on board. The Indonesian NTSC ruled that the cause of the accident could not be determined, while the United States NTSB concluded that the incident was "consistent with ... intentional pilot action".
And it seems that is nothing related to the pessengers or airport security.
Finally, I checked Air India...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India#Accidents_and_incidents
There was no major accidents after 1990. The one on 1990 caused no fatalities. But their record in 80's was terrible....
If we plot a graph about number of incidents aganist time, we will get this one:
Interesting....
After talking to someone, said that to be fair, the fleet size does matter. I agree and I try to find the incident rate... I could find some reference and the result was not very suprise... According to the above.
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/rates.htm
DISCLAIMER These accident rates should not be used to provide an assessment of an airline’s safety profile or future risk of an accident. These rates are derived from past accidents and not an estimate or prediction of future risk. There are many additional factors in judging the safety of an air carrier which are not included here. These rates are not meant to endorse or condemn any particular airline or group of airlines nor are they intended to persuade or dissuade use of any particular airline. The accident rates and method of calculation of the accident rates are solely the opinion of this web site and the creator is not responsible for how this information is used and will not be held legally responsible for any consequences arising from the use of this information. There are numerous commercial organizations that provide complete and extensive safety ratings of commercial air carriers.
For the regoinal ranking in Asia, it was listed as follows. The number in the blanket after is the global ranking.
1: All Nippon Airways (8/88)
2: Japan Airlines (10/88)
3: Qantas (12/88)
4: Hanin airlines (What is it?) (24/88)
5: Air New Zealand (25/88)
6: Cathay Pacific (29/88)
7: Malaysia Airlines (36/88)
10: Air India (45/88)
11: Dragon Air (49/88)
16: Garuda Indonesian (73/88)
18: Singapore Airlines / Silkair (78/88)
19: China Eastern Airlines (79/88)
22: China Airlines (88/88)
SQ is just slightly better than 華航... oh my god!
The last major accident was 15-Jun-1972. I was not on this earth yet. That accident killed 81 people. It was caused by a exploded bomb under a seat when flying.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific#Incidents_and_accidents
In wiki, it also indiciated other incidents dated from1948-1972.
Nothing really interesting, but CX awarded "This was the first hijacking of a commercial liner in the world...."...,
When I was about to sleep, "What about SQ?" popped up in my head. With all these some kind additional and duplicated, security and safety checking and even the crews claimed all these just because of our safety....
The list in aiddiaster.com was actually much shorter... only 1 major accident.
However, it was on 31-Oct-2000, it seemed to me very close... and I could probably trace what I was doing that day....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_airline#Incidents_and_accidents
31 October 2000 – Singapore Airlines Flight 006 operated by a Boeing 747-400, crashed at Chiang Kai-shek International Airport (now Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport) in Taiwan killing 83 people aboard and injuring 71 people during heavy rain caused by Typhoon Xangsane. SQ006 was the first fatal crash of a Singapore Airlines aircraft and the first fatal crash of the Boeing 747-400.
The scary part was, this incident was nothing to with multiple baggage scanning (before immigration, before boarding) and duplicated document check. (counter, before boarding, boarding).
In wiki, it also contained a link to SilkAir, which is an airline based in Singapore. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore Airlines Airline... I think this is a budget version of SQ.
I clicked the link about incidents again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir#Incidents_and_accidents
On December 19, 1997, SilkAir Flight 185, operated by a Boeing 737-300 and piloted by Captain Tsu Way Ming, plunged into the Musi River in Sumatra during a routine flight from Jakarta to Singapore, killing all 104 people on board. The Indonesian NTSC ruled that the cause of the accident could not be determined, while the United States NTSB concluded that the incident was "consistent with ... intentional pilot action".
And it seems that is nothing related to the pessengers or airport security.
Finally, I checked Air India...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India#Accidents_and_incidents
There was no major accidents after 1990. The one on 1990 caused no fatalities. But their record in 80's was terrible....
If we plot a graph about number of incidents aganist time, we will get this one:
Interesting....
After talking to someone, said that to be fair, the fleet size does matter. I agree and I try to find the incident rate... I could find some reference and the result was not very suprise... According to the above.
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/rates.htm
DISCLAIMER These accident rates should not be used to provide an assessment of an airline’s safety profile or future risk of an accident. These rates are derived from past accidents and not an estimate or prediction of future risk. There are many additional factors in judging the safety of an air carrier which are not included here. These rates are not meant to endorse or condemn any particular airline or group of airlines nor are they intended to persuade or dissuade use of any particular airline. The accident rates and method of calculation of the accident rates are solely the opinion of this web site and the creator is not responsible for how this information is used and will not be held legally responsible for any consequences arising from the use of this information. There are numerous commercial organizations that provide complete and extensive safety ratings of commercial air carriers.
For the regoinal ranking in Asia, it was listed as follows. The number in the blanket after is the global ranking.
1: All Nippon Airways (8/88)
2: Japan Airlines (10/88)
3: Qantas (12/88)
4: Hanin airlines (What is it?) (24/88)
5: Air New Zealand (25/88)
6: Cathay Pacific (29/88)
7: Malaysia Airlines (36/88)
10: Air India (45/88)
11: Dragon Air (49/88)
16: Garuda Indonesian (73/88)
18: Singapore Airlines / Silkair (78/88)
19: China Eastern Airlines (79/88)
22: China Airlines (88/88)
SQ is just slightly better than 華航... oh my god!
Labels:
cathay pacific,
garuda,
indonesia,
singapore,
singapore airlines,
transportation,
travel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


